Research Papers Due 6:00PM, Monday, December 7, 2009

To Remind You:

Your final research paper should be a work of high quality. Please be sure that you clearly identify a paper topic and submit it via e-mail to me by October 19, 2009.(Let’s hope you did this)  You may not have a clear theme, concept or point of view in mind by that time, but you must  have a fairly narrowly defined topic or issue. You should soon be developing a reading list and reading on the topic you choose. I will expect a written reading list or “works cited” on a date I will assign. Please keep the following in mind:

1) give yourself enough time!! Start !!

2) ask for help…see the library staff ASAP or arrange for a tutor. See the Writing Program as early as possible.

• be sure to properly cite your sources. In the past, this has caused significant problems. MLA format is the standard for SUNY Delhi. Check the class web site for links to research sources and for links to helpful articles on writing a research paper:     http://govt150.wordpress.com/

4) work with each other in discussing your topics and reviewing ideas or drafts of the paper.

5) Remember…be sure that your paper has a central theme or idea; e.g., an analysis of a U.S. Supreme Court decision.

6) the paper must be fifteen pages or longer. (This does not include endnotes, references, works cited etc.)  In reviewing the civil liberties topic, the issues or problems that it raises, and summarizing the analysis and your conclusions, you will need a substantial paper.

7) I will read only legible, word-processed drafts of your paper. The due date is December 7, 2009.

8) write the paper in your own well-chosen words…I do not want pages of quotations from your sources. However, your tone must be academic-not colloquial. Originality counts!!

9) plagiarism will result in failure of the assignment and the class.

10) No Late Papers Will Be Accepted!!

The instructor may be reached via email at:

lennyesq@hancock.net

Assignments for November 30, 2009

November 30, 2009 is the final date to hand in short written assignments!!

Hand in any prior assignments you are missing. This includes assignments you were given an opportunity to redo. It is better to have a low grade with a penalty for lateness, than to receive a “0″.

REMINDER: YOUR RESEARCH PAPERS ARE DUE AT 6:00PM, MONDAY, DECEMBER  7TH, 2009.

You should now have completed your research and be finishing writing your paper.

Finish reading Chapter Six of Sullivan, the required text.

Assignments for November 23, 2009

Finish reading Chapter Five and begin reading Chapter Six of Sullivan, the required text.

Hand in your 3rd Short written assignment.

Hand in any prior assignments you are missing. This includes assignments you were given an opportunity to redo. It is better to have a low grade with a penalty for lateness, than to receive a “0″.

REMINDER: YOUR RESEARCH PAPERS ARE DUE AT 6:00PM, MONDAY, DECEMBER  7TH, 2009.

You should now have completed your research and be writing your paper.

12 Klansmen rally briefly before LSU-Ole Miss game

 

Members of the Ku Klux Klan protest on the steps of Fulton Chapel at theAP – Members of the Ku Klux Klan protest on the steps of Fulton Chapel at the University of Mississippi in …
Sat Nov 21, 2:39 pm ET

OXFORD, Miss. – About a dozen hooded Ku Klux Klan members rallied briefly at the University of Mississippi before Saturday’s football game with No. 10 LSU.

The members of the Mississippi White Knights of the Ku Klux Klanspent about 10 minutes waving flags, displaying Nazi-style salutes and occasionally gesturing at a group of about 250 hecklers that included young children. They were protesting the school’s decision to drop a pep song that included “Dixie.”

Some fans had been ending the song by chanting, “The South will rise again.” Chancellor Dan Jones asked the band to stop playing the song after fans ignored a request to drop the chant.

The Klan said it was protesting over lost Southern symbolism at Ole Miss, which has been rocked by racial strife before.

 

JURIST: New York high court rules same-sex spouses of state employees entitled to benefits

Photo source or description

[JURIST] The New York Court of Appeals [official website] on Thursday dismissed a challenge [opinion, PDF] to two policies that provide benefits to same-sex couples married outside of the state. The first policy was a 2006 decision by the Westchester County executive to extend benefits to same-sex spouses of county employees. The second policy was a 2006 decision [memorandum, PDF] by the president of the New York Civil Service Commission, mandating an extension of full benefits to all spouses of state employees enrolled in the New York State Health Insurance Plan. Prior to that decision, extension of benefits to same-sex spouses was at the discretion of the individual state agencies. In explaining the court’s decision to affirm the Appellate Division’s dismissal, Judge Eugene Pigott Jr. stated that in regards to the Westchester policy, the plaintiffs failed to provide evidence of specific harms resulting from the policy, relying instead on, “bare legal conclusions with no factual specificity.” In regards to the State Civil Service Commission policy, Pigott noted that under sections 161 and 164 of the New York Civil Service Laws[legislative materials], the commission president is authorized to establish a health insurance plan for state officers and their dependents, and that the president has discretion to define the scope of dependents for purposes of benefits. In a concurring opinion joined by three others, Judge Carmen Ciparick stated that she would have simply affirmed the dismissal on the grounds that, “same-sex marriages, valid where performed, are entitled to full legal recognition in New York under our State’s longstanding marriage recognition rule.”

Currently, New York does not permit same-sex marriages [JURIST news archive], but in April, Governor David Patterson announced legislation [JURIST report] that would allow same-sex couples to be married in the state. That legislation was approved [JURIST report] by the state assembly in May, and a senate vote isexpected before the end of the year [NYT report]. Patterson had previously issued an order to all state agencies in 2008 to recognize same-sex marriages, citing a New York Appellate Division ruling [JURIST reports] that same-sex marriages performed out of state are entitled to recognition in New York.

Assignments for November 16, 2009

 

Finish reading Chapter 5 of the required text by Sullivan.
The third short written assignment will be handed out at the beginning of class.  Please be present to receive a detailed explanation of this assignment, which is also posted on the class web site:

Important Note on the Use of URLs in MLA

MLA no longer requires the use of URLs in MLA citations. Because Web addresses are not static (i.e. they change often) and because documents sometimes appear in multiple places on the Web (e.g. on multiple databases), MLA explains that most readers can find electronic sources via title or author searches in Internet Search Engines.
For instructors or editors who still wish to require the use of URLs, MLA suggests that the URL appear in angle brackets after the date of access. Break URLs only after slashes.
Aristotle. Poetics. Trans. S. H. Butcher. The Internet Classics Archive. Web Atomic and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 13 Sept. 2007. Web. 4 Nov. 2008. <http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle.html>.

Unbearable Pain: India’s Obligation to Ensure Palliative Care

http://www.hrw.org/en/reports/2009/10/28/unbearable-pain-0

The Human Rights Watch organization has written this report, which talks about the difficulties faced by patients in major cancer hospitals across India. Released in October 2009, this 102-page report takes an investigative look into the pain treatment situation in these hospitals. The report identifies three key obstacles to improving the availability of pain treatment and palliative care, including restrictive drug regulations and the failure to train doctors about pain treatment methods. Visitors will find that the report is divided into several major sections including “Palliative Care and Pain Treatment in India” and “The Plight of Patients”. Additionally, interested parties can also view the appendices attached to the report. An online slide show and a video feature round out the site.

Gitmo Delay Report Blames White House

 

[JURIST] The likely failure to meet the self-imposed deadline for the closure of the Guantanamo Bay detention facility [JURIST news archive] is due to several missteps by the Obama administration, according to a report [text, PDF] released Tuesday by the Center for American Progress (CAP) [advoca…

 

 

Rhode Island governor vetoes burial rights for domestic partners

Photo source or description

[JURIST] Rhode Island Governor Don Carcieri [official profile] vetoed legislation [text, PDF] on Tuesday that would have allowed domestic partners, including those in same-sex relationships, to claim the body of their partner and to make funeral arrangements. Neither domestic partnerships or civil unions are recognized in Rhode Island, and the bill would have required that a same-sex partner produce documentation establishing the nature of the relationship, such as proof of a joint bank account, mortgage, or car registration, and that the relationship had lasted for a year or longer. In his letter to lawmakers [text, PDF] explaining the veto, Carcieri said:

This bill represents a disturbing trend over the past few years of the incremental erosion of the principles surrounding traditional marriage, which is not the preferred way to approach this issue. If the General Assembly believes it would like to address the issue of domestic partnership, it should place the issue on the ballot and let the people of State of Rhode Island decide.

The sponsors of the bill, Senator Rhonda Perry and Representative David Segal [official profiles] have promised to push for an override [AP report] of the veto in the state legislature, where Democrats hold enough seats to make that possible.

The veto of the burial rights bill comes amid a larger battle in Rhode Island over same-sex marriage, which, according to a Brown University poll [press release], has the approval of 60 percent of registered voters in the state. Rhode Island and Maine remain the only two states in New England that do not recognize same-sex marriage. Advocates for same-sex couples have been met with mixed results over the last few years. Legislation to legalize same-sex marriage was vetoed in Maine [JURIST report] last week, but similar legislation was successful in New Hampshire and Vermont [JURIST reports] earlier this year. Legislation to the same end was passed [JURIST report] by the New York State Assembly in May, but has since stalled in the state senate. In April, the Iowa Supreme Court overturned [JURIST report] that state’s ban on same-sex marriage, following the supreme courts of ConnecticutCalifornia, and Massachusetts [JURIST reports]. Last November, California voters approved Proposition 8 [JURIST report], making California the first state to outlaw same-sex marriage after legalizing it.