Sen. Feingold Criticizes Warrantless Laptop Seaches

[JURIST] US Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI) [official website] has criticized the Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) [official website] warrantless searches and seizures of travelers’ laptops and other digital devices at the US border, calling the searches anunacceptable invasion of privacy [hearing materials]. The Supreme Court has held that reasonable suspicion is not necessary to conduct routine searches at the border, but searches of laptops and other digital devices are analogous to more invasive practices such as strip searches, said Feingold, who chairs the Senate Subcommittee on the Constitution [official website]. In his opening statement at a congressional hearing on this issue last week, Feingold said [speech text]:

Ideally, Fourth Amendment jurisprudence would evolve to protect Americans’ privacy in this once unfathomable situation. But if the courts can’t offer that protection, then that responsibility falls to Congress. Customs agents must have the ability to conduct even highly intrusive searches when there is reason to suspect criminal or terrorist activity, but suspicionless searches of Americans’ laptops and similar devices go too far. Congress should not allow this gross violation of privacy.

For the very latest legal news on Paper Chase, click hereFor the latest newsworthy legal documents, video, live webcasts and more, visit JURIST’s home page

Court Dismisses Arar Rendition Suit

CIVIL PROCEDURE, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, GOVERNMENT LAW, IMMIGRATION LAW, INJURY AND TORT LAW, INTERNATIONAL LAW
Arar v. Ashcroft, No. 06-4216
In an action brought pursuant to the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA) and Fifth Amendment by a dual citizen of Syria and Canada alleging he was mistreated by U.S. officials in the United States and removed to Syria with the knowledge or intention that Syrian authorities would interrogate him under torture, grant of defendants’ motion to dismiss is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff satisfied the Article III requirements as to certain claims and made a prima facie showing sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction over defendants in New York; 2) plaintiff’s allegations about the events surrounding his removal to Syria did not state a claim against defendants under the TVPA; 3) the circuit court rejects counts which would have required judicial creation of a cause of action pursuant to the Bivens doctrine, with regards to removal-related claims; 4) allegations about the mistreatment he suffered while in the United States did not state a due process claim against defendants; and 5) plaintiff did not establish federal subject matter jurisdiction over his request for a declaratory judgment. 

Judges Cite Lewis Carroll Poem To Justify Release of Alleged ‘Enemy Combatant’

PARHAT V. GATES
[U.S. D.C. Circuit, June 30, 2008] - In the first review of its kind under the Detainee Treatment Act, the government’s determination that a Chinese Guantanamo detainee is an “enemy combatant” was reversed by a federal appeals court. The appellate court reasoned, “Lewis Carroll notwithstanding, the fact that the government has ’said it thrice’ does not make an allegation true,” particularly when the source alleging his associations with al Qaeda and the Taliban was the Chinese government.

NY TIMES:George Carlin, the Comedian, Is Dead at 71

Breaking News Alert

The New York Times

Monday, June 23, 2008 — 1:15 AM ET

—–
George Carlin, the Grammy-Award winning standup comedian and

actor who was hailed for his irreverent social commentary,

poignant observations of the absurdities of everyday life and

language, and groundbreaking routines like “Seven Words You

Can Never Use on Television,” died in Los Angeles on Sunday

according to his publicist Jeff Abraham. He was 71.

 

Read More:

http://www.nytimes.com/?emc=na

***

 Carlin’s famous routine was the subject of the US Supreme Court’s decision in FCC v. Pacifica Foundation, et.al. [1978]

CAE Defense Fund: ARTIST CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES IN PRECEDENT-SETTING CASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 

June 11, 2008

 

CONTACTS: 

Email: media@caedefensefund.org 

Dr. Steven J. Kurtz: (716) 812-2968 

Lucia Sommer, CAE Defense Fund: (716) 359-3061 

Edmund Cardoni, Hallwalls Contemporary Arts Center: (716) 854-1694

 

ARTIST CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES IN PRECEDENT-SETTING CASE 

Department of Justice Fails to Appeal Dismissal 

Kurtz Speaks about Four-Year Ordeal

 

Buffalo, NY–Dr. Steven Kurtz, a Professor of Visual Studies at SUNY at

Buffalo and cofounder of the award-winning art and theater group Critical

Art Ensemble, has been cleared of all charges of mail and wire fraud. On

April 21, Federal Judge Richard J. Arcara dismissed the government’s entire

indictment against Dr. Kurtz as “insufficient on its face.” This means that

even if the actions alleged in the indictment (which the judge must accept

as “fact”) were true, they would not constitute a crime. The US Department

of Justice had thirty days from the date of the ruling to appeal. No action

has been taken in this time period, thus stopping any appeal of the

dismissal. According to Margaret McFarland, a spokeswoman for US Attorney

Terrance P. Flynn, the DoJ will not appeal Arcara’s ruling and will not seek

any new charges against Kurtz.

 

For over a decade, cultural institutions worldwide have hosted Kurtz and

Critical Art Ensemble’s educational art projects, which use common science

materials to examine issues surrounding the new biotechnologies. In 2004 the

Department of Justice alleged that Dr. Kurtz had schemed with colleague Dr.

Robert Ferrell of the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public

Health to illegally acquire two harmless bacteria cultures for use in one of

those projects. The Justice Department further alleged that the transfer of

the material from Ferrell to Kurtz broke a material transfer agreement, thus

constituting mail fraud.

 

Under the USA PATRIOT Act, the maximum sentence for these charges was

increased from five years to twenty years in prison.

 

Dr. Kurtz has been fighting the charges ever since. In October 2007, Dr.

Ferrell pleaded to a lesser misdemeanor charge after recurring bouts of

cancer and three strokes suffered since his indictment prevented him from

continuing the struggle.

 

KURTZ SUMS UP END OF FOUR-YEAR NIGHTMARE

 

Finally vindicated after four years of struggle, Kurtz, asked for a

statement, responded stoically: “I don’t have a statement, but I do have

questions. As an innocent man, where do I go to get back the four years the

Department of Justice stole from me? As a taxpayer, where do I go to get

back the millions of dollars the FBI and Justice Department wasted

persecuting me? And as a citizen, what must I do to have a Justice

Department free of partisan corruption so profound it has turned on those it

is sworn to protect?”

 

Said Kurtz’s attorney, Paul Cambria,  “I am glad an innocent man has been

vindicated. Steve Kurtz stared in the face of the federal government and a

twenty-year prison term and never flinched, because he believes in his work

and his actions were those of a completely innocent man. Clients like him

are a blessing, and although I have had many important victories, this one

stands at the top of the list.”

 

As coordinator of the CAE Defense Fund, a group organized to support Kurtz

from the beginning of the case, Lucia Sommer sees the end of the prosecution

as bittersweet, and like Kurtz, is thoughtful about the broader significance

of the case:  “This ruling is the best possible ending to a horrible

ordeal–but we are mindful of numerous cases still pending, and the grave

injustices perpetrated by the Bush administration following 9/11. This case

was part of a larger picture, in which law enforcement was given expanded

powers. In this instance, the Bush administration was unsuccessful in its

attempt to erode Americans’ constitutional rights.” 

 

Referring to the international outcry the case provoked, involving

fundraisers and protests held on four continents, Sommer said, “The

government has unlimited resources to bring and prosecute these kinds of

charges, but the accused often don’t have any resources to defend

themselves. This victory could never have happened without the activism of

thousands of people. Supporters protested, vocally opposed the prosecution,

and refused to let it go on in silence. And without their efforts at

fundraising, Kurtz and Ferrell would not have been able to defend themselves

from these false accusations.”

 

Sommer added that the next step for the defense will be to get back all of

the materials taken by the FBI during its 2004 raid on the Kurtz home,

including several completed art projects, as well as Dr. Kurtz’s lab

equipment, computers, books, manuscripts, notes, research materials, and

personal belongings.  The four confiscated art projects are the subject of

an exhibition entitled SEIZED on view at Hallwalls Contemporary Arts Center

in Buffalo, NY, through July 18:

http://www.hallwalls.org/visual_shows/2008/show_seized.html.

 

BACKGROUND TO THE CASE

 

The case originated in May 2004, when Kurtz’s wife Hope died of heart

failure as the couple was preparing a project about genetically modified

agriculture for the Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art. Police who

responded to Steve Kurtz’s 911 call deemed the Kurtzes’ art materials

suspicious and alerted the FBI. Kurtz explained that the materials (legally

and easily obtained basic life science equipment and two harmless bacteria

samples) had already been displayed at museums throughout Europe and North

America with absolutely no risk to the public. However, the following day,

Kurtz was illegally detained for 22 hours on suspicion of bioterrorism, as

dozens of agents from the FBI, Joint Terrorism Task Force, Homeland

Security, Department of Defense, ATF, and numerous other law enforcement

agencies raided his home, seizing his personal and professional belongings. 

After a federal grand jury refused to charge Kurtz with bioterrorism, Kurtz

and Ferrell were indicted on two counts of mail fraud and two counts of wire

fraud concerning the acquisition of  of harmless bacteria for one of

Critical Art Ensemble’s educational art projects. (Critical Art Ensemble is

the recipient of numerous awards for its projects, including the prestigious

2007 Andy Warhol Foundation Wynn Kramarsky Freedom of Artistic Expression

Grant, in recognition of twenty years of distinguished work:

http://www.creative-capital.org/index2.html.)

 

The Department of Justice brought the charges in spite of the fact that the

alleged “victims of fraud”–American Type Culture Collection and the

University of Pittsburgh–never filed any charges or complained of any

wrongdoing, and the fact that in bringing the charges the Department of

Justice was acting completely outside its own Prosecution Policy Relating to

Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud

(http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/43mcrm.htm).

 

 

For more information and extensive documentation, including the Judge’s

dismissal, please visit: http://caedefensefund.org

Baghdad on the Potomac

WASHINGTON - Police in the nation’s capital set up controversial vehicle checkpoints Saturday in a neighborhood reeling from gun violence, with civil liberties groupsconsidering legal action and closely observing officers.

Police in neon yellow vests stopped motorists traveling through the main thoroughfare of Trinidad — a neighborhood near the National Arboretum in the city’s northeast section. Police checked drivers’ identification and turned away those who didn’t have a “legitimate purpose” in the area, such as a church visit or doctor’s appointment.

The checkpoints were announced after eight people were killed in the city last weekend. Most of the killings occurred in the police district that includes Trinidad. Already this year, the district has had 22 killings — one more than in all of last year.

The checkpoints have drawn harsh criticism from civil rights groups.

“Trinidad should not be treated like Baghdad,” said Mark Thompson, the leader of the NAACP’s local police task force.

***

Read the entire article from Yahoo! News/AP.

California Supreme Court Overturns Gay Marriage Ban


The New York Times - Breaking News, World News & Multimedia

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS1 minute ago

The ruling paves the way for California to become the second state where gay men and lesbians can marry.
Text of the Opinion

Paperchase Reports: US immigration agents face problems transiting drugged deportees overseas

Andrew Gilmore at 12:03 PM ET

Photo source or description

[JURIST] US immigration agents transiting involuntarily sedated immigration deportees through foreign countries have been challenged by local authorities, the Washington Postreported Wednesday. The paper said French and Belgian law enforcement officials had raised objections to the sedation of individuals by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) [official website] agents at stopovers during two recent deportation flights from the US to Guinea. In one case, Belgian authorities informed US immigration guards accompanying the deportee that the medication of a person against his will was illegal in Belgium, but allowed the deportation to proceed. In a second incident, French officials informed US immigration guards that involuntary injections were illegal in France, and refused to allow the detainee to be sedated during a stopover. The detainee forcefully refused to board the flight from France to Guinea after the sedatives wore off, the captain of the plane refused to allow the detainee to board, and the deportee was returned to the US. Reuters has more.

The report highlights the tension between US deportation practices and international laws [PDF text] regarding involuntary medication and sedation, an issue of increasing importance in recent months. In February, ICE reached a settlement [JURIST report] in a federal class action suit brought by theAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Southern California(ACLU/SC) [advocacy website] on behalf of two immigrants who were forcibly sedated [JURIST report] during deportation flights. In January, the agency released a memo requiring its officers to obtain a judge’s approval [JURIST report] before a deportee can be sedated in order to facilitate his or her removal from the US.

NYS Court of Appeals Leaves 4th Dept Decision Recognizing Canadian Gay Marriage In Place

NY Sun (Joseph Goldstein): Court Decision Is Victory For Gay Marriage Backers

Gay marriage advocates have won a partial victory in New York, as the state’s highest court has left in place a lower court ruling that recognized a lesbian couple as being married. The Court of Appeals declined yesterday to review the mid-level appellate court’s decision to recognize the couple’s Canadian marriage, the first such ruling by an appellate court in New York State. For now, that lower court decision remains binding across the state. In 2006, the state’s Court of Appeals found that there was no right to same-sex marriages under the state constitution, leaving unanswered the question of whether the state would recognize same-sex marriages and civil unions performed in other states and abroad.

***

Democrat and Chronicle (Gallagher and Craig): County at crossroads over same-sex benefits lawsuit

The state’s highest court Tuesday sent back to a lower court a case involving whether Monroe County has to recognize a marriage between two women, leaving the county to determine whether to continue its appeal challenging same-sex marriage. The Court of Appeals refused to hear the case of Patricia Martinez, an employee of Monroe Community College, who sued the county after it refused to grant benefits to Martinez’s female partner, Lisa Ann Golden, whom she married in Canada in 2004. The state Supreme Court ruled initially that they were not entitled to benefits, but that was overturned 5-0 by the mid-level Appellate Division, Fourth Department, of the state Supreme Court

Posted in News. No Comments »

Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia) Dies

By DIONNE WALKER, Associated Press WriterMon May 5, 4:17 PM ET

RICHMOND, Va. - Mildred Loving, a black woman whose challenge to Virginia’s ban on interracial marriage led to a landmark Supreme Court ruling striking down such laws nationwide, has died, her daughter said Monday.

Peggy Fortune said Loving, 68, died Friday at her home in rural Milford. She did not disclose the cause of death.

“I want (people) to remember her as being strong and brave yet humble — and believed in love,” Fortune told The Associated Press.

Loving and her white husband, Richard, changed history in 1967 when the U.S. Supreme Court upheld their right to marry. The ruling struck down laws banning racially mixed marriages in at least 17 states.

***

 

Read entire article.